>17 year old
Ahhhh nopenopenopenopenope
Blueberry Patreon
Sun, 09/16/2018 - 13:44
#3
Sun, 09/16/2018 - 17:04
#4
doubleintegral
FWIW, her Twitter says she lives in Massachusetts where the age of consent is 16.
Sun, 09/16/2018 - 20:33
#5
Its 16 here in Kentucky as well, but 18 is the cut off point for me considering that is when you're legally considered an adult. Just my two cents, but at my age, 18 is still a bit young for my tastes. Talked to her though, Ill give her the credit she isnt ignorant as to the context of all of this and is polite
Mon, 09/17/2018 - 00:36
#6
blueberryjuicer
while I understand where you are coming from, age of consent is the legal age to declare consent between minors
it is not the age in which people over 18 can do the do. there is a reason why LVK said she was underaged, and that is because if a grown adult were caught in bed with her, itd be declared statutory rape as far as I am aware.
Mon, 09/17/2018 - 06:32
#7
doubleintegral
while I understand where you are coming from, age of consent is the legal age to declare consent between minors
it is not the age in which people over 18 can do the do. there is a reason why LVK said she was underaged, and that is because if a grown adult were caught in bed with her, itd be declared statutory rape as far as I am aware.
This is incorrect. The age of consent is the age at which you are declared legally competent to give consent to an adult (21 I think). Statutory rape only comes into play when one (and only one) of the two people is under that age. If both are at or over the age of consent, there is no statutory rape.
Mon, 09/17/2018 - 08:14
#8
blueberryjuicer
In this context, she is underaged, regardless of the age of consent. My rule is, if the person cannot get into an age gated porn site without lying, they are not able to produce the content at all.
If we are going to argue legality as well, I do wish to cite "The United States vs Stephen Knox," a case which declared content produced with persons that included 17 year olds, illegal and nondefensible. In this case, the producer of the content stated the ages, and the consumers defense was that he was not aware, due to the producer's statement was that the content was "perfectly legal."
To quote:
"Nather's disclaimer could not reasonably lead Knox to believe that the videotapes were legal. If anything, the need to profess legality should have alerted Knox to the films' dubious legality."
The court ruled that this kind of content wasn't legal. There is no excuse here either, given the reason for the content and what it is.
Sun, 09/16/2018 - 21:39
#11
inflatingclothes
She's the girl who got harrassed by someone in the community. It got so bad she did a story time about it.
Mon, 09/17/2018 - 00:38
#12
blueberryjuicer
yes.
Mon, 09/17/2018 - 05:54
#13
>someone
Lets just be honest here, we know it was Butters. He admitted to it and frankly I'm getting really fucking tired of him soliciting to minors.
Mon, 09/17/2018 - 06:36
#14
doubleintegral
BTW, it looks like she deleted all the blueberry-related videos from her YouTube channel sometime after this thread was created. I'm sure someone here is responsible for that.
She's also underage, according to her Patreon. I'll pass.