Still, it doesn't make any sense - it's only your opinion - when I joined this site in 2003 (as another account I lost later), I thought it really represents all aspects of inflation because it really looked like so and I could find all although things changed later. It's ONE fetish, only some specifics may differ, that are the preferences - and the fact that the administrator decided that real practising "oficially" sucks is only HIS opinion just like YOURS but it doesn't change the nature of the fetish itself.
It's not like I would like defend the real inflation, I just hate when someone says that something isn't valid just because (s)he says so.
Failure of premise.
Denying the antecedent.
Argument by analogy.
Take your pick.
The website does not HAVE to represent all aspects of inflation. It doesn't have to do anything more than the owner wishes. There is no contract, there isn't even an implied agreement. Any such is inferred.
It's not one fetish. I'm an inflationist, not a RL inflationist. Yes, by not doing one thing, that excludes me from being a part of one fetish. If I'm an inflationist and I don't do RL inflation then that specifically denies the antecedent.
An equally apt (and wrong) analogy would be that I'm an inflationist therefore I like furry inflation. Which is not the case. The broad brush is absent of specificity.
Not taking the piss either.
TTF (That's the fuck)